For institutionsVenuesBenchmarksScoreboardAPISEE THE SCORECARD
EnsoTrade › Institutions › Compare › Maker vs taker

Maker vs taker: should you rest or cross a large crypto order?

A maker order rests and earns the lower (sometimes zero) fee but risks adverse selection; a taker order crosses for certainty and pays the higher fee plus the spread. The cheaper choice depends on the venue's fees and the spread at the moment.

The maker case

On a zero-maker-fee venue, resting saves the taker fee and the half-spread — real basis points across a large order. It works best when you can be patient and the book is not about to run against you.

The taker case

When you need certainty, or the maker fee is high enough that adverse selection eats the saving, crossing is cheaper in expectation. The decision is venue- and moment-specific, and should be priced, not assumed.

How EnsoTrade measures it

EnsoTrade prices a large order against live order books across venues — which venues to use, what size each piece should be, and whether to rest an order or cross the spread. It is independent measurement, not execution: your own desk or execution partner keeps placing the orders on its own accounts, and we never touch custody, keys or funds. Before a window we price it at your real clip size on the venues you can use; after a window we score the fill with full workings. We quote no price or saving until you give your real clip size and fee stack — then the number is yours to check.

FAQ

Is it cheaper to rest (maker) or cross (taker) a crypto order?
On a zero-maker venue, resting usually wins for patient size; on a positive-maker-fee venue, adverse selection can erase the saving. Price the decision per venue rather than assuming.
What is adverse selection in maker orders?
A resting order tends to fill exactly when the price is about to move against you, because informed traders take the stale quote. It is the hidden cost that can offset a maker fee saving.

Related

RFQ vs order bookTWAP vs VWAP vs implementation shortfallSingle venue vs multi-venue routing for large crypto ordersBenchmarks

Independent execution measurement

Price an order before you trade and score the fill after, on live multi-venue order books. We never touch custody, keys or orders — the independence is the point.

Request an assessment →See the scorecard →API →